SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Singh & Singh Law Firm LLP – Appellant
Versus
Singh+Singh Lawyers LLP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. exemption from filing notarized documents. (Para 3 , 4)
2. exemption from filing court fees. (Para 7 , 8)
3. leave to file additional documents under commercial courts act. (Para 11 , 12)
4. exemption from pre-litigation mediation. (Para 14 , 15)
5. allegations of trademark infringement and evidence. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
6. defendant's argument on lack of urgency and jurisdiction. (Para 27)
7. court's observations on likelihood of confusion and injunction. (Para 28 , 30 , 31)
8. orders for injunction and further court directions. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)

ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

I.A. 7144/2021 (for exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

I.A. 7145/2021 (for exemption from filing affidavit without notarization/attestation and for exemption for vakalatnamas from bearing seal /stamp of Plaintiffs)

3. The present application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short `CPC') on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeks exemption from filing affidavits without notarization/attestation and further, seeks exemption from filing vakalatnamas without seal/stamp of the Plaintiffs.

4. The Plaintif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top