GVK Jaipur Expressway Private Limited vs National Highway Authority of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Table of Content
1. petition filed under a&c act against arbitral award. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background of concession agreement phases. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. discussions on traffic congestion and proposed additional toll lanes. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. petitioner submitted work orders for additional toll lanes. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. nhai's denial of 'change of scope' payment. (Para 16 , 17)
6. arbitral proceedings and claims for reimbursement. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. arbitral tribunal's findings on petitioner’s obligations. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
8. contentions regarding alleged patent illegality. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
9. tribunal’s definitions and interpretations of contract clauses. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
10. importance of interpretation of contract in this dispute. (Para 37 , 38)
11. scope of project as per the concession agreement. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
12. clarification of obligations under the operation and maintenance phase. (Para 43 , 44 , 45)
13. review of implications of section 34 of a&c act on arbitration clauses. (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
14. failure of tribunal to consider clause 18.4. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
15. setting aside of the impugn