Pink City Expressway Private Limited vs National Highway Authority of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Table of Content
1. petitioner filed for operational rights based on the concession agreement. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details on project completion and nhai's commitments. (Para 3 , 4)
3. the concession extension is automatic upon traffic shortfall. (Para 5 , 6)
4. nhai must follow specific procedures outlined for termination. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. dispute resolution mechanism should address the arguments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. court observations on good faith and obligations of nhai. (Para 13 , 14)
7. urging the protection of lenders' interests in disputes. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
8. arguments on financial agreements and obligations. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
9. petitioner seeks relief against nhai's refusal to extend concession. (Para 21 , 22)
10. assessing eligibility for relief based on submissions made. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
11. outcome must consider broader implications for public interest. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
12. final remarks on the necessity of maintaining contract sustainability. (Para 29 , 30)
13. court dismisses the petition based on factual findings. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
14. liberal approach suggested for rights of all parties. (Para 34 , 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. (Oral)--The present petition