SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Era-Patei-Advance (JV) – Appellant
Versus
Rail Vikas Nigam Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. confirmation of withdrawal request. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petition disposed as withdrawn. (Para 3)

ORDER (Oral)

C. Hari Shankar, J.

O.M.P. (COMM) 212/2021, I.A. 9282/2021, I.A. 9283/2021 (Section 151 CPC for exemption), I.A. 9284/2021 (Section 151 CPC for delay in refiling), I.A. 9285/2021 (Section 151 CPC for exemption) and I.A. 13729/2021 (for taking on record settlement)

1. Mr. Suhail Sehgal, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks on instructions to withdraw the petition as the disputes between the parties stand amicably resolved. He has, however, invited my attention to the communication dated 10th September, 2021 from the respondent to the petitioner, forming document A2 to IA 13729/2021. The said communication calls upon the petitioner to withdraw OMP (COMM) 167/2021. He submits that this was a typographical error and that the request of the respondent to the petitioner was to withdraw the present OMP (COMM), i.e. OMP (COMM) 212/2021.

2. Mr. J.K. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent, confirms this position.

3. As the disputes between the parties stand amicably resolved, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the petition is di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top