Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Indiabulls Distribution Services Limited – Appellant
Versus
B.G.A Realtors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement of disputes (Para 1) |
| 2. acknowledgment of settlement (Para 2) |
| 3. disposal of petitions (Para 3) |
(Video-Conferencing)
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw these petitions, stating that the disputes between the parties stand settled vide settlement agreement dated 7th November, 2020.
2. The statement is taken on record.
3. The petitions are disposed of.
The court affirmed that parties can withdraw legal petitions upon reaching a settlement, reinforcing party autonomy in dispute resolution.
The right to withdraw a petition with leave to approach the arbitral tribunal is affirmed, emphasizing procedural flexibility in arbitration matters.
The court allows withdrawal of writ petitions under Article 226 where parties settle their disputes out of court.
The court recognized that once parties resolve their disputes amicably, the associated petitions can be withdrawn, rendering further adjudication unnecessary.
The court dismissed the writ petition at the petitioner's request, affirming the authority to withdraw the case.
A petitioner can withdraw a writ petition if a settlement is reached before the Trial Court.
The court permits the withdrawal of civil petitions when the parties have settled the matter out of court, emphasizing justice and equity.
The court recognizes that disputes resolved amicably warrant the withdrawal of petitions, supporting judicial endorsement of agreed settlements.
A petition can be withdrawn without further orders if the parties have settled their matter amicably.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
