SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Balaji Constructions – Appellant
Versus
Shivani Dudani – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for arbitration (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. disputes over arbitration terms (Para 4 , 5)
3. appointment of arbitrator (Para 6 , 7)
4. order and disposal of petition (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by petitioner seeking appointment of Sole Arbitrator under the provisions of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2. The Petitioner is a registered partnership and the respondents were the owners of a free hold plot of land bearing No. 7 on Road No. A-23 measuring 420 sq. Mtrs (502.32 sq. Yds. Approx.) situated in the residential colony, DLF City Phase-I, Gurugram, Haryana.

3. The petitioner entered into an Agreement on 15.06.2019 with the respondents for development and construction of property bearing No. A23/7, DLF City Phase-I, Gurugram, Haryana. However, according to petitioner, the respondents backed out/resiled from performing their part of the said agreement by raising frivolous issues and since the efforts to amicably resolve the disputes arose between the parties, the petitioner approached this Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [O.M.P (I) (COMM.) No. 22

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top