SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Surinder Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Prime Property Realty – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition for arbitrator appointment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court observations on respondent attendance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. arguments for appointing arbitrator. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. appointment and conditions of arbitrator. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. conclusion and disposal of petition. (Para 16)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by petitioner seeking appointment of an Arbitrator under the provisions of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2. According to petitioner, on 10.05.2019, respondents No.1 to 3 entered into a collaboration agreement with the respondents No.4 to 7 for construction and development of the property belonging to respondents No.4 to 7 bearing No.97, Block C, Chander Nagar, Janak Puri, New Delhi-110058 ad-measuring 195 sq. yds.

3. Accordingly, respondents No.1 to 3 were supposed to commence the construction within 15 days of handing over possession of the aforesaid property and the same was to be completed before expiry of 20 months in accordance with plan sanctioned by Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

4. Subsequently, with respect to the above-mentioned Collaboration Agreement, the respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top