Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Raunak Singh – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of plaintiff's claim for adverse possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's arguments against plaintiff's claim. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's analysis of adverse possession requirements. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. conclusion and order for suit dismissal. (Para 27 , 28) |
ORDER
I.A.11419/2020 (by the DDA under Order VII Rule 11 read with Orders VI and VII read with Section 151 CPC for dismissal of the suit)
1. This order shall dispose of an application moved by the defendant No.1/Delhi Development Authority (DDA) seeking rejection of the suit under Order VII Rule 11 read with Orders VI and VII read with Section 151 CPC.
2. The plaintiff has filed this suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction against 17 defendants. Defendant No.1 is the DDA, defendant No.2 is New Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC), defendants No.3 & 4 are the deceased brothers of plaintiff (through L.Rs.) and defendants No.5 to 16 are private defendants, and defendant No.17 is the Union of India through Ministry of Rehabilitation Department.
3. The "suit property" is a plot bearing No.3400, Ra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
