JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through Physical Mode.

1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 84/2019 under Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 (in short the 'Act') and Section 323 IPC registered at PS Parliament Street on the complaint of respondent No.2 on merits.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the ground on which the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR in question is that FIR has been lodged with mala fide, to wreck vengeance which is one of the criteria laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision reported as 1992 SCC (Crl.) 426, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal for quashing of the FIR. To buttress this contention, learned counsel for the petitioner states that there is a chequered history between the two parties.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner and respondent No.2 were married on 18th February, 2018. On the complaint of the petitioner, FIR No. 185/2019 under Sections 395/511/398/201/120-B/34 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act was registered at PS Pandav Nagar against the respondent No.2 and her associates wherein the allegati