SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Genius Presentation Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with the following prayers:

    "a. Pass an order in favour of petitioner and against the Respondent thereby restraining the respondent from encashing the Performance Bank Guarantee No.027GT02211790014 amounting to Rs.4,50,142 dated 28.06.2021 and;

    b. Restrain the respondent no.2 from blacklisting/debarring the petitioner in further tender of the remaining work.

    c. Restrain the respondent no.2 in issuance of the fresh tender in respect of the remaining work,

    d. Pass an ex-parte interim order in terms of prayers A-C above"

2. Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner/Company, which is engaged in the business of offering pioneer and advance display technologies in total digital display solutions, had participated in the tender issued by respondent No.1/Central Public Works Department (for short, "CPWD") bearing No.01/EE(e)/IITIPED/2021-22 for the work of supplying, installation, testing and commissioning of Video Wall and other equipments at auditorium at the estimated cost of Rs.3,33,80,966/-. The tender was awarded to the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top