Genius Presentation Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Genius Presentation Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. nature of the arbitration petition (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's grievance about non-action by the respondents (Para 4 , 6 , 7)
3. court's procedural observations (Para 5 , 8 , 9)
4. assessment of the interim relief's validity (Para 10 , 11)
5. validation of 'make in india' compliance (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
6. respondents' actions based on non-performance (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
7. no merit in the petition due to defaults (Para 22 , 23)
8. dismissal order summary (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

1. This petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with the following prayers:

"a. Pass an order in favour of petitioner and against the Respondent thereby restraining the respondent from encashing the Performance Bank Guarantee No.027GT02211790014 amounting to Rs.4,50,142 dated 28.06.2021 and;

b. Restrain the respondent no.2 from blacklisting/debarring the petitioner in further tender of the remaining work.

c. Restrain the respondent no.2 in issuance of the fresh tender in respect of the remaining work,

d. Pass an ex-parte interim order in terms of prayers A-C above"

2. Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTASHA MENONGenius Presentation Pvt. Ltd. – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Genius Presentation Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent