SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
D.N. Patel, Jyoti Singh, JJ.
Amit Sahni - Appellant
Versus
High Court of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 13554 of 2021
Decided On : 01-12-2021




Petitioner has the right to have their representation decided by authorities, with the court affirming legal recourse for any grievances.

Headnote:(A) Constitutional Law - Right to seek redress - Petitioner allowed to pursue representation dated 20.08.2021 before the concerned authorities in accordance with law. (Para 1)

(B) Writ Petition - Court directs timely consideration of petitioner's representation and acknowledges potential further legal remedies. (Para 3)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner presented a writ petition requesting action on a specific representation, indicating grievances requiring official attention.

Findings of Court:
The court ordered the respondents to address the representation promptly.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was the requirement for the concerned authorities to decide on the petitioner's representation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the petitioner's right to seek a response from the authorities, affirming the legal process in handling grievances through established channels.

Result: Writ petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petitioner requests representation decision (Para 1)
2. respondents directed to decide representation (Para 2 , 3)
3. writ petition disposed with observations (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)

CM APPL. 42774/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 42775/2021 (Exemption from filing attested affidavit)

For the reasons stated in the application and in view of the present prevailing situation, the present application is allowed. However, the applicant is directed to file duly signed and affirmed affidavits within a period of one week from the date of resumption of regular functioning of the Court.

Application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 13554/2021

1. Petitioner, who appears in person, submits that suffice would it be for disposal of the writ petition if the representation dated 20.08.2021 (Annexure P-2 to the memo of this petition) is decided by the concerned Respondent Authorities in accordance with law, keeping in mind the grievances ventilated in the writ petition.

2. In view of this limited submission, we direct the Respondents to look into the representation dated 20.08.2021 preferred by the Petitioner, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and practicable.

3. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to take recourse to the remedies available to him, in accordance with law in case the need so arises and/or if he is aggrieved with the decision on his representation.

4. With these observations and directions, writ petition is hereby disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top