SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Interactive BPO Services Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks refund of tax adjustments exceeding 20% (Para 1 , 4)
2. legal framework for tax demand recovery and stay procedures (Para 2 , 3)
3. direction for refund and closure of proceedings (Para 6 , 10)
4. court's analysis of legal compliance in tax adjustments (Para 7 , 8)
5. entitlement to refund based on legal provisions (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed seeking refund of Rs.54,45,128/- which was adjusted in excess of 20% of the total disputed tax demand for the Assessment Year 2018-19 against the refunds due for the Assessments Years 2019-20 and 2020-21. Petitioner also seeks directions to the Respondents to hear and dispose of the appeal filed against the order dated 5th April, 2021 under Section 143 (3) of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 [for short `the Act'] that is currently pending.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that under Section 220 (6) of the Act, the Assessing Officer has been conferred with the power to grant stay on recovery of outstanding tax demand subject to fulfilment of appropriate conditions. He states that in order to provide guidance and lay down principles regarding stay of demand, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top