Hindustan Antibiotics Limited vs B.N. Singh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Hindustan Antibiotics Limited – Appellant
Versus
B.N. Singh – Respondent

Table of Content
1. challenge of termination of workman. (Para 2 , 3)
2. details of domestic enquiry and proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. court’s views on evidence and jurisdiction. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21)
5. reinstatement vs. compensation principles. (Para 23 , 25 , 26)
6. final directions regarding compensation. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by M/s Hindustan Antibiotics Limited (hereinafter, `Management') challenging various orders passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court - XVII, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter, `Labour Court') in LIR No. 207/16/10 (ID No. 236/10), finally culminating into impugned Award dated 2nd February, 2016. This petition seeks quashing of the said Award and various orders passed by the Labour Court, and also seeks remand of the matter back to the Labour Court to decide afresh after hearing the Management's case.

3. The brief background of the matter is that the Respondent- Workman was appointed as a Medical Representative in the office of the Management in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTPRATHIBA M.SINGHHindustan Antibiotics Limited – AppellantVersusB.N. Singh – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Hindustan Antibiotics Limited – Appellant
Versus
B.N. Singh – Respondent