SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Amit Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Rastogi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. procedural issues in hearing (Para 2 , 3)
2. background of the dispute and claims (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's findings on management's claims (Para 6 , 11)
4. arguments from both parties (Para 7 , 9 , 10)
5. awarding compensation to the workman (Para 12 , 13)
6. conclusion and order (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The present writ petition challenged the impugned award dated 22nd December, 2018 in LIR No.9389/16 titled Sh. Amit Kumar Sharma v. Sh. Sanjeev Rastogi, by which the claim filed by the Petitioner/Workman (hereinafter "Workman") was rejected by the Labour Court.

3. In this matter, notice was issued vide order dated 12th April, 2019. The Management's counsel had appeared on the first few dates being 27th August, 2019 and 6th February, 2020, and opportunity was granted to the Management to file their reply. However, vide order dated 6th February, 2020, the right to file reply was closed. On subsequent dates being 24th November 2020, 29th January, 2021 and 6th October, 2021, despite the Management having been served, there has been no appearance on its behalf. Vide previous order dated 6th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top