DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Amit Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Rastogi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural issues in hearing (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of the dispute and claims (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's findings on management's claims (Para 6 , 11) |
| 4. arguments from both parties (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. awarding compensation to the workman (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. conclusion and order (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. The present writ petition challenged the impugned award dated 22nd December, 2018 in LIR No.9389/16 titled Sh. Amit Kumar Sharma v. Sh. Sanjeev Rastogi, by which the claim filed by the Petitioner/Workman (hereinafter "Workman") was rejected by the Labour Court.
3. In this matter, notice was issued vide order dated 12th April, 2019. The Management's counsel had appeared on the first few dates being 27th August, 2019 and 6th February, 2020, and opportunity was granted to the Management to file their reply. However, vide order dated 6th February, 2020, the right to file reply was closed. On subsequent dates being 24th November 2020, 29th January, 2021 and 6th October, 2021, despite the Management having been served, there has been no appearance on its behalf. Vide previous order dated 6th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.