Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's process regarding reports on kalkaji mandir (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. djb's actions for water and sewage in the mandir complex (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. removal of unauthorized constructions and jhuggi dwellers (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conditions affecting dharamshalas and occupancy (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. creation of temporary shops amidst redevelopment (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. identification and allotment of shopkeepers (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 27) |
| 7. contribution for redevelopment by baridars (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. recovery of mesne profits/damages from illegal occupant (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 9. suit against unauthorized occupants of the dharamshala (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 54) |
| 10. legal status of occupant and case recommendations (Para 57 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 11. order compliance and report submission (Para 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done by video conferencing.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
3. In terms of the order dated 21st December 2021, this Court received a detailed report from the Ld. Administrator da
Court emphasized the authority of the Administrator in managing religious premises, focusing on the removal of unauthorized occupants and the proper structuring of redevelopment plans.
The central legal point established is the court's authority to direct stakeholder contributions, fund management, and compliance with redevelopment directives.
The court underscored the importance of cooperative redevelopment involving community contributions for timely management and safety of the temple premises.
Court upheld the importance of managing and redeveloping temple premises while balancing the interests of stakeholders involved, ensuring proper representation and administration of the site.
The court ruled on the necessity of redevelopment of temple premises while ensuring the rights of pujaris and addressing grievances of unauthorized occupants.
The court established that unlawful occupants of public premises must be evicted for safety during religious gatherings, ensuring proper relocation options are provided yet not favoring unauthorized ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for ongoing progress in the demarcation process, proper placement of street vendors, resolution of redevelopment issues, and conducting a ....
Unauthorized occupation of religious premises is illegal; the Court mandates removal to ensure redevelopement for public safety.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of accommodating the interests of pujaris and baridaars in the redevelopment process and ensuring their active participation.
Court emphasizes proactive measures against encroachment on religious premises, directing authorities to erect a boundary wall and manage shopkeeper licenses to ensure compliance and community welfar....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
