SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Sapna Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Gupta – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[VIA HYBRID MODE]

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter the `Act'] seeks interim measures to preserve and protect the rights of the Petitioner in a partnership firm-Metal Cans Company, New Delhi, pending constitution of arbitral tribunal for adjudication of disputes inter se partners of the firm.

2. Vide an ex-parte order dated 23rd August, 2021, Respondents have been restrained from alienating or creating third party interest in respect of immovable properties of the partnership firm and have further been directed to maintain status quo in respect of a property that is stated to have been purchased by siphoning off monies of the firm. The said order is currently in force.

3. The Respondents, at the outset, raised a preliminary issue regarding maintainability of the present petition on the ground that the clause contained in the partnership deed falls short of the essential requirements contemplated under law to constitute an arbitration agreement. On this issue, Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Pawanjit Singh Bindra, Senior Counsel for the Respondents ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top