Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Tata Projects Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
NTPC Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual context regarding the arbitration (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. disputes and claims due to project delays (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. procedural aspects of arbitration initiation (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. arbitral tribunal's findings on claims (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. court's review and rationale for award dismissal (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 6. legal interpretation regarding responsibility for delays (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 7. ruling on service tax and reimbursement issues (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The parties have filed these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act') impugning an Arbitral Award dated 01.12.2020 (hereinafter the `impugned award') passed by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted of three members, Justice (Retd.) Badar Durrez Ahmed, Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal and Justice (Retd.) Dr. Mukundakam Sharma as the Presiding Arbitrator (hereinafter `the Arbitral Tribunal').
2. The impugned award has been rendered in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation with the ag
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
