SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
Tata Projects Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
NTPC Limited - Respondent
O.M.P. (COMM) 139 of 2021 and O.M.P. (COMM) 171 of 2021 and IA Nos. 6288 of 2021 & 6289 of 2021
Decided On : 08-12-2021




Arbitral tribunals have discretion over fact-finding, and courts should not re-evaluate evidence unless decisions violate public policy or involve patent illegality.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - Disputes under contract for execution of works relating to Coal Handling Plant Package for Lara Super Power Thermal Project - Claims for additional amounts due to delays, GST reimbursement, and liquidated damages - Arbitral Tribunal ruled that disputes were covered under Force Majeure; no additional compensation awarded for prolongation costs; liability for liquidated damages denied; TPL entitled to reimbursement of additional expenses for wage increase and GST adjustment. (Paras 26, 29, 30, 31, 60)

(B) Public Policy - Judicial interference in arbitral awards should only occur in cases of public policy violations or patent illegality; principles reiterated including that courts do not re-evaluate evidence or reassess findings of the arbitrators. (Paras 55, 56, 58)

Facts of the case:
The disputes arose between parties due to delays in execution attributed to various causes including delays in work fronts and external disturbances. TPL claimed additional costs due to these delays and also sought GST reimbursement while NTPC sought liquidated damages for delays.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that neither party could hold the other entirely responsible for delays; thus, additional compensation was denied. TPL was awarded claims related to increased labor wages and GST.

Issues: The primary issues were the entitlement of TPL to prolongation costs and reimbursement of expenses due to wage increases and GST as well as NTPC’s claim for liquidated damages.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal concluded that contractual obligations were revised mutually, delays were covered under Force Majeure, and thus no compensation for prolongation was warranted, while additional costs due to wage increases were compensable under the contract.

Result: Petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual context regarding the arbitration (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. disputes and claims due to project delays (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. procedural aspects of arbitration initiation (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
4. arbitral tribunal's findings on claims (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
5. court's review and rationale for award dismissal (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
6. legal interpretation regarding responsibility for delays (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)
7. ruling on service tax and reimbursement issues (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The parties have filed these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act') impugning an Arbitral Award dated 01.12.2020 (hereinafter the `impugned award') passed by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted of three members, Justice (Retd.) Badar Durrez Ahmed, Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal and Justice (Retd.) Dr. Mukundakam Sharma as the Presiding Arbitrator (hereinafter `the Arbitral Tribunal').

2. The impugned award has been rendered in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation with the agreements dated 12.09.2014 for execution of certain works relating to the Lara Super Power Thermal Project.

Factual Context

3. On 05.06.2014, NTPC issued an Invitation for Bids (IFB) for the works regarding "Coal Handling Plant Package for Lara Super Power Thermal Project, Stage 1 (2 x 800 MW)" (hereinafter `the Project'), on the terms and conditions stipulated therein.

4. Pursuant to the said IFB, Tata Projects Ltd. (hereinafter `TPL') participated in the two stage bidding process. It submitted its bids for executing the Project works: Techno Commercial Bid dated 27.06.2014 (Stage I) and Price Bid dated 13.08.2014 (Stage II). TPL also submitted a discount letter dated 14.08.2014. TPL's bid was accepted and thereafter, NTPC issued three Notifications of Awards dated 26.08.2014 (hereinafter `NoA') in favour of TPL.

5. The effective date of commencement of the contract was 26.08.2014 and Unit No.1 was to be executed within a period of thirty months and Unit no.2 was to be executed within thirty-four months from the effective date of commencement of the contract.

6. Thereafter, on 12.09.2014, three `Contract Agreements' (hereinafter collectively referred as the `Agreements') were signed between the parties for a total consideration of EURO 5,10,000/- and Rs.321,95,59,742/-. The details of the three Agreements are tabulated below:

Contract Agreement [CS-9548-155(R)-2-FC-COA-6200] for contract price of EUR 5,10,000/- (hereinafter referred to as `Foreign Supply Contract')Design, engineering, manufacture, procure, shop fabrication, testing, inspection at manufacturers works, packing, supply, forwarding and dispatch of offshore plant arid equipment on CIF (Indian Port-of-Entry) basis for the Coal Handling Plant Package for Lara Super Power Thermal Project, Stage 1 (2 x 800 MW).
Contract Agreement [CS-9548-155(R)-2-FC-COA-6201] for contract price of Rs.195,38,42,140/- (hereinafter referred to as `Domestic Supply Contract')Design, engineering, manufacture, procure, testing, inspection at manufacturers works, packing, supply, forwarding and dispatch of plant and equipment on Ex- Works (India) supply basis for the Coal Handling Plant Package for Lara Super Power Thermal Project, Stage 1 (2 x 800 MW)
Contract Agreement [CS-9548-155(R)-2-FC-COA-6202] for a contract price of Rs.126,57,17,602/- (hereinafter referred to as `Services Contract')In-land Transportation, Inland Insurance, Erection, Testing, Commissioning and conducting guarantee tests of the Coal Handling Plant Package for Lara Super Power Thermal Project, Stage 1 (2 x 800 MW)

7. The works under the aforesaid three Agreements were awarded on a lump sum basis. The Agreements for supply - the Domestic Supply Contract and Foreign Supply Contract - were exclusive of taxes and duties and, the Agreement

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top