SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
NTPC Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Larsen and Toubro Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The parties have filed these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 12.06.2020 (hereinafter `the impugned award') delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted of three members, Mr Arun Kumar, I.A.S (Retd.), Justice M.Y. Eqbal (Retd.) and Justice Dr Mukundakam Sharma (Retd.) as the Presiding Arbitrator (hereafter `the Arbitral Tribunal').

2. The controversy in the present case arises in the following context:

2.1. Tenders were invited by NTPC Limited (hereafter `NTPC') for implementation of contracts relating to setting up of the Khargone Super Thermal Power Project (hereinafter `the Project'). The work was divided into three packages as under:

    Contract Package 1 : CIF Supply (Indian Port of Entry)

    Contract Package 2 : Ex-works (India) Supply

    Contract Package 3 : Inland Transportation, Inland Insurance, Civil Works, Structural Works, Installation, Testing & Commissioning of EPC

2.2. Larsen and Toubro Limited (hereafter `L&T') had participated in the bidding process pursuant to the aforesaid notice inviting tenders. L&T's bid for the contracts was accepted a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top