SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Chenab Construction Joint Venture – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of the arbitration dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding excepted matters (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 11)
3. findings regarding excepted matters and claims (Para 12 , 13 , 18)
4. ruling on interest claims and contract provisions (Para 15 , 24)
5. final dismissal of the petition (Para 26)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The present petition filed by Union of India [hereinafter, "UoI"] under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, "the Act"] impugns the Award dated 11th October, 2019 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating disputes arising out of work awarded on 7th February, 2016 to the Respondent-Chenab Construction Joint Venture [hereinafter, "CHENAB"] for `Design and construction of viaduct for single line B.G Railway Track between KM 32.690 and 33.853 in the Zone No. E-18 in Jammu-Udhampur Rail Link Project, including - soil investigation, detailed designs and construction of foundation, pier and abutments and super structure' [hereinafter, the "Project"].

2. The afore-noted work was initially allotted for a term of 24 months, however, due to various hinderances, nine separate extensions were granted to CH

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top