SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Indraprastha World School - Appellant
Versus
Chitra Srivastava - Respondent
FAO 9 of 2022 & CM Appls. 1436-37 of 2022
Decided On : 10-01-2022




Interim observations in an appeal do not constitute a final opinion and must not affect the impartiality of the trial court's decision on pending applications under Order 39.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Appeal against interim orders - The court observed that prior observations made were prima facie, and did not constitute a final opinion on the merits of the case. - The appeal aimed to address concerns regarding service of the respondent. (Paras 4-6)

(B) Appeal - Disposal of appeal with directions - The court directed that prior observations should not influence the trial court's decision on the application under Order 39, and the trial court should expedite its proceedings in accordance with law while being impartial. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The appellant appealed against multiple interim orders, claiming that these effectively decided their application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2, despite not being resolved. The respondent had reportedly not been served, leading to concerns regarding the proceedings continuity.

Findings of Court:
The appeal was disposed of with directives on serving the respondent and the treatment of earlier observations as merely advisory rather than binding.

Issues: The main issues were the implications of interim orders and the propriety of serving the respondent through legal counsel.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that interim observations should not affect the trial court's impartial decision-making process regarding pending applications.

Result: Appeal disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. appellant seeks to set aside prior orders. (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding court observations on pending application. (Para 3)
3. court's observations are prima facie. (Para 4)
4. directions for service and trial court proceedings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
5. copy of the order to be uploaded and communicated. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Appellant seeks setting aside of orders dated 11.11.2021, 27.11.2021, 29.11.2021 and 06.12.2021.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though the application of the appellant under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 has not been decided as yet but several observations have been made by the Court in the above orders which in effect decide the application. He further submits that despite respondent having been served repeatedly Court has issued fresh notice.

4. It is observed that the observations of the Court in the above referred orders are only prima facie and cannot amount to an expression of opinion on the merits of the application. In so far as the service of the respondent is concerned, it is informed by learned counsel for the appellant that a Suit for Recovery has been filed by the respondent which is also listed before the same Court tomorrow.

5. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of with a direction that in case respondents are not served in terms of order dated 29.11.2021, appellant be permitted to serve the respondent through the counsel, who is appearing for the respondent in the suit filed by the respondent that is stated to be listed before the same Court tomorrow itself.

6. Further it is directed that the observations contained in the above referred orders shall be treated as prima facie and not amount to an expression of opinion and the Trial Court shall dispose of the application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 filed by the appellant, expeditiously in accordance with law without being influenced by any of the observations referred to in the above orders.

7. Appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

8. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top