IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
Pradeep Kumar - Appellant
Versus
BSES Yamuna Power Limited - Respondent
W.P.(C) 15525 of 2022
Decided On : 21-11-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. correct petitioner's address mistakenly listed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner seeks restoration of electricity supply. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondent agrees to restore electricity meter. (Para 5) |
| 4. electricity as a basic amenity. (Para 6) |
| 5. conditions for restoring electricity connection. (Para 7) |
| 6. order made without prejudice to rights. (Para 8) |
| 7. writ petition disposed of. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the memo of parties, the petitioner's address has been inadvertently mentioned as 14149/910, A/2 Street No.8, Jagjivan Nagar, Loni Road, Shahdara Delhi-110093 whereas the correct address is 1449/910, A/2 Street No.8, Jagjivan Nagar, Loni Road, Shahdara Delhi-110093.
2. It is noted that notice was directed to be issued to respondent No. 2 which as per office noting, stands served however, none is present for respondent No. 2.
3. By way of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who claims to be an occupant of property bearing No. 1449/910, A/2 Street No.8, Jagjivan Nagar, Loni Road, Shahdara Delhi 110093 (hereinafter, referred to as the `subject premises'), seeks direction to the respondent No. 1 to restore the electricity meter at the subject premises.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an occupant in the subject premises and disputes are pending between the parties i.e., the petitioner and respondent No. 2 with respect to ownership of the subject premises. It is submitted that on 28.08.2021, respondent No. 1 disconnected the electricity supply of the subject premises.
5. Without prejudice to their rights and contentions, learned counsel for respondent No. 1, on instructions, submits that the electricity meter would be restored at the subject premises.
6. This Court deems it apposite to refer to the observations made by the Supreme Court in Dilip (Dead) through Lrs. v. Satish & Others, Criminal Appeal No. 810/2022, wherein it has been held as under:
"It is now well settled proposition of law that electricity is a basic amenity of which a person cannot be deprived. Electricity cannot be declined to a tenant on the ground of failure/refusal of the landlord to issue no objection certificate. All that the electricity supply authority is required to examine is whether the applicant for electricity connection is in occupation of the premises in question.
xxx
The impugned order cannot be sustained and the same is set aside. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
It is however made clear that electricity supply granted, shall not be discontinued, subject to compliance by the Respondents of the terms and conditions of supply of electricity by the electricity department including payment of charges for the same."
7. Keeping in view the aforenoted observations of the Supreme Court as well as without entering into the controversy with respect to title/ownership of the subject premises, the present writ petition is disposed of in the following terms:
(i) The petitioner shall make an application for grant of a fresh electricity connection within seven days from today.
(ii) The respondent No. 1 shall process the said application for restoration of electricity connection forthwith without insisting on a NoC from co-owners.
(iii) The petitioner shall comply with all the codal and commercial requirements of the respondent No. 1.
(iv) The petitioner shall also deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the respondent/BSES in addition to the regular security deposit that he is required to make under the rules or regulations.
(v) The petitioner shall pay the consumption charges in accordance with the bills raised by the respondent No.1/BSES from time to time/till the time he occupies the subject premises.
(vi) The petitioner shall not seek adjustment of the security deposit. However, on the petitioner vacating th
Electricity is a fundamental amenity that must be provided to occupants, irrespective of ownership disputes, ensuring connectivity based solely on occupancy.
Electricity is a basic amenity that cannot be denied to a tenant solely based on the landlord's refusal to issue a No Objection Certificate.
Electricity is a basic amenity and cannot be declined to a tenant based on the landlord's refusal to issue a No Objection Certificate.
Electricity as a basic amenity must not be denied to a tenant due to landlord's refusal to provide a No Objection Certificate.
Electricity supply cannot be denied to a lawful occupant based on landlord's refusal to provide NOC; the applicant's legal occupation is sufficient for connection processing.
Petitioner is entitled to apply for a new electricity connection without requiring landlord's NOC, provided all dues are cleared and formalities complied with.
Electricity is an essential service and cannot be declined to a tenant based on the landlord's refusal to issue an NOC.
The tenant has the right to seek a new electricity connection without requiring a no-objection certificate from the owner, subject to compliance with formalities and payment obligations.
Electricity is recognized as a fundamental right essential for existence under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and filing a civil suit does not bar a petition under Article 226.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.