SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
BSES Yamuna Power Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the memo of parties, the petitioner's address has been inadvertently mentioned as 14149/910, A/2 Street No.8, Jagjivan Nagar, Loni Road, Shahdara Delhi-110093 whereas the correct address is 1449/910, A/2 Street No.8, Jagjivan Nagar, Loni Road, Shahdara Delhi-110093.

2. It is noted that notice was directed to be issued to respondent No. 2 which as per office noting, stands served however, none is present for respondent No. 2.

3. By way of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who claims to be an occupant of property bearing No. 1449/910, A/2 Street No.8, Jagjivan Nagar, Loni Road, Shahdara Delhi 110093 (hereinafter, referred to as the `subject premises'), seeks direction to the respondent No. 1 to restore the electricity meter at the subject premises.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an occupant in the subject premises and disputes are pending between the parties i.e., the petitioner and respondent No. 2 with respect to ownership of the subject premises. It is submitted that on 28.0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top