Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Jagran Prakashan Limited – Appellant
Versus
3Y3 Digital Labs Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute arising from advertising services agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. invocation of arbitration and consent to arbitrator. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. appointment of sole arbitrator and compliance requirement. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. conclusion and order for arbitration. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes with the respondent.
2. Petitioner-company claims to be duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and involved in the business of News print and publication, Digital Marketing, Online Media, etc. on pan India basis. Petitioner entered into an advertising services agreement with respondent on 06.04.2018, according to which petitioner and respondent had to work jointly towards utilizing respondent's real time monetization marketplace software (STACK) and respondent's smart inventory creation program (AXT).
3. It is claimed in the present petition that in consideration to the agreement, petitioner was entitled to raise invoices upon respondent @ USD 0.663 per E CPM based on ad request generated on
The court's decision emphasized the importance of consent and lack of objection from both parties in appointing a sole arbitrator.
The court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court can appoint an Arbitrator when parties fail to mutually agree, as per agreement provisions and arbitration law.
Non-compliance by a party allows the court to appoint a sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration Act when arbitration notices are ignored.
Court may appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act when parties fail to respond to dispute communications.
In the absence of opposition, a court may appoint an arbitrator based on deemed service through electronic means for resolving contractual disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between parties when there is an agreement to refer the disputes to arbit....
Appointment of an arbitrator is essential when disputes arise from contractual agreements and non-compliance with demand notices, reinforcing the obligations under the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac....
Court can appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with mutual consent of the parties for efficient dispute resolution.
The court's decision highlights the importance of honoring arbitration clauses in agreements and the appointment of arbitrators to resolve disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
