IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Jagran Prakashan Limited - Appellant
Versus
3Y3 Digital Labs Private Limited - Respondent
Arb.P. 1096 of 2021
Decided On : 13-12-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute arising from advertising services agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. invocation of arbitration and consent to arbitrator. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. appointment of sole arbitrator and compliance requirement. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. conclusion and order for arbitration. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes with the respondent.
2. Petitioner-company claims to be duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and involved in the business of News print and publication, Digital Marketing, Online Media, etc. on pan India basis. Petitioner entered into an advertising services agreement with respondent on 06.04.2018, according to which petitioner and respondent had to work jointly towards utilizing respondent's real time monetization marketplace software (STACK) and respondent's smart inventory creation program (AXT).
3. It is claimed in the present petition that in consideration to the agreement, petitioner was entitled to raise invoices upon respondent @ USD 0.663 per E CPM based on ad request generated on DFP (Double Click of Publisher). Accordingly, a total sum of USD 107,169.19 was to be paid by the respondent for the period 01.04.2018 to 30.01.2019 However, respondent paid only USD 44136.69 and the balance amount of USD 61681 or Rs.46,15,435/- is still due to the respondent.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner sent multiple reminders and requests and thereafter, on 18.01.2021, petitioner sent a demand notice for making the payment of outstanding amount, in response to which respondent sent an email dated 02.02.2021 wherein it denied to make any further payment.
5. Subsequently, petitioner, in terms of Clause 11 of the Conditions to the Agreement dated 06.04.2018 invoked arbitration in accordance to which a Sole Arbitrator was to be mutually appointed by the parties but respondent rejected the name of the Arbitrator proposed by petitioner. Therefore, the present petition has been filed.
6. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for petitioner has prayed that sole Arbitrator may be appointed to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.
7. Learned counsel for respondent has not disputed invocation of arbitration vide Notice dated 30.07.2021 and has not objected to the appointment of sole Arbitrator for adjudication of dispute between the parties.
8. In view of the above and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is allowed. Accordingly, Mr. Amrit Pal Singh Gambhir (Mobile:9810082347) is appointed sole Arbitrator in this petition to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.
9. The fee of the learned Arbitrator shall be governed by the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
10. The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.
11. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly.
12. A copy of this order be sent to the learned Arbitrator for information.
The court's decision emphasized the importance of consent and lack of objection from both parties in appointing a sole arbitrator.
The court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court can appoint an Arbitrator when parties fail to mutually agree, as per agreement provisions and arbitration law.
Non-compliance by a party allows the court to appoint a sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration Act when arbitration notices are ignored.
Court may appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act when parties fail to respond to dispute communications.
In the absence of opposition, a court may appoint an arbitrator based on deemed service through electronic means for resolving contractual disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between parties when there is an agreement to refer the disputes to arbit....
Appointment of an arbitrator is essential when disputes arise from contractual agreements and non-compliance with demand notices, reinforcing the obligations under the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac....
Court can appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with mutual consent of the parties for efficient dispute resolution.
The court's decision highlights the importance of honoring arbitration clauses in agreements and the appointment of arbitrators to resolve disputes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.