IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Extramarks Education India Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
Rishabh Academy - Respondent
Arb.P. 946 of 2021
Decided On : 22-10-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute related to payment under agreements (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. invocation of arbitration process (Para 5) |
| 3. respondents’ non-appearance in proceedings (Para 6) |
| 4. appointment and rules for arbitrator (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. disposal of the petition (Para 10) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. The present petition has been filed by petitioner seeking appointment of Sole Arbitrator under the provisions of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for adjudication of disputes with the respondents.
2. Petitioner-Extramarks Education India Private Limited, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013. Respondents no.1 and 2 are educational institutions, which are managed by respondent no.3 and owned by respondent no.4.
3. According to petitioner, respondents entered into agreements on 13.11.2017, 01.02.2018, 08.03.2018 and 26.04.2018 for sale, implementation, installation of hardware, software and multimedia system accessories for the purpose of setting up of 67 Smart Learn Classes at the premises of respondent nos.1 & 2. However, despite agreeing to the payment schedule mentioned in the Agreements and multiple reminders sent by the Petitioner, respondents have only paid a minor share of the total amount due, as per the terms and condition agreed between the parties.
4. According to the petitioner, a demand letter dated 25.08.2020 was sent to the respondents for the payment of outstanding amount, which was replied by the respondent on 07.09.2020. Thereafter, petitioner sent a counter reply dated 05.10.2020 & reminder notice dated 29.10.2020 to the respondent nos.1, 3 & 4, which were not replied by the respondents.
5. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already invoked arbitration vide notice dated 02.08.2021 under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for invocation of arbitration under clause 13 of the abovementioned agreements and requests this Court to appoint an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
6. It is pertinent to mention here that despite service affected upon the respondents, no one has appeared on their behalf. An affidavit of service has also been filed by the petitioner. Hence, it seems that the respondents have chosen not to object the present petition.
7. Accordingly, Mr. R.B.Singh, DHJS (Retd.) is appointed the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.
8. The fee of the learned Arbitrator shall be governed by the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
9. The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.
10. The present petition is accordingly disposed of.
Court may appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act when parties fail to respond to dispute communications.
The court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
In the absence of opposition, a court may appoint an arbitrator based on deemed service through electronic means for resolving contractual disputes.
Non-compliance by a party allows the court to appoint a sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration Act when arbitration notices are ignored.
The court's decision emphasized the importance of consent and lack of objection from both parties in appointing a sole arbitrator.
Appointment of an arbitrator is essential when disputes arise from contractual agreements and non-compliance with demand notices, reinforcing the obligations under the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac....
The court can appoint an Arbitrator when parties fail to mutually agree, as per agreement provisions and arbitration law.
Court can appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with mutual consent of the parties for efficient dispute resolution.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when a dispute arises and no arbi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between parties when there is an agreement to refer the disputes to arbit....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.