SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Extramarks Education India Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
Rishabh Academy - Respondent
Arb.P. 946 of 2021
Decided On : 22-10-2021




Court may appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act when parties fail to respond to dispute communications.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11 - Petition for appointment of Sole Arbitrator - Petitioner seeks appointment due to non-payment of dues by respondents under various agreements for educational services - Demand notices issued, but respondents did not appear or object - Sole Arbitrator appointed. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Arbitration - Invocation of arbitration clauses and appointment of arbitrators - Court allows appointment when parties fail to respond to notices and disputes remain unresolved. (Paras 5-7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a company, filed a petition against educational institutions for non-payment following agreements for setting up Smart Learn Classes, despite reminders and demand letters issued.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the respondents had chosen not to participate in the proceedings, thus facilitating the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.

Issues: The main issue revolves around the need for an arbitrator appointment in light of unresolved disputes and respondents' failure to respond.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that when a party to an arbitration agreement does not respond to communications regarding disputes, the other party can seek judicial appointment of an arbitrator.

Result: Petition disposed of with the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.

Table of Content
1. dispute related to payment under agreements (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. invocation of arbitration process (Para 5)
3. respondents’ non-appearance in proceedings (Para 6)
4. appointment and rules for arbitrator (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. disposal of the petition (Para 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. The present petition has been filed by petitioner seeking appointment of Sole Arbitrator under the provisions of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for adjudication of disputes with the respondents.

2. Petitioner-Extramarks Education India Private Limited, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013. Respondents no.1 and 2 are educational institutions, which are managed by respondent no.3 and owned by respondent no.4.

3. According to petitioner, respondents entered into agreements on 13.11.2017, 01.02.2018, 08.03.2018 and 26.04.2018 for sale, implementation, installation of hardware, software and multimedia system accessories for the purpose of setting up of 67 Smart Learn Classes at the premises of respondent nos.1 & 2. However, despite agreeing to the payment schedule mentioned in the Agreements and multiple reminders sent by the Petitioner, respondents have only paid a minor share of the total amount due, as per the terms and condition agreed between the parties.

4. According to the petitioner, a demand letter dated 25.08.2020 was sent to the respondents for the payment of outstanding amount, which was replied by the respondent on 07.09.2020. Thereafter, petitioner sent a counter reply dated 05.10.2020 & reminder notice dated 29.10.2020 to the respondent nos.1, 3 & 4, which were not replied by the respondents.

5. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already invoked arbitration vide notice dated 02.08.2021 under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for invocation of arbitration under clause 13 of the abovementioned agreements and requests this Court to appoint an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

6. It is pertinent to mention here that despite service affected upon the respondents, no one has appeared on their behalf. An affidavit of service has also been filed by the petitioner. Hence, it seems that the respondents have chosen not to object the present petition.

7. Accordingly, Mr. R.B.Singh, DHJS (Retd.) is appointed the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

8. The fee of the learned Arbitrator shall be governed by the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9. The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.

10. The present petition is accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top