SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Mohd. Suleman – Appellant
Versus
New Delhi Municipal Council – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant's long-standing grievances regarding shop demolition. (Para 1 , 3)
2. arguments about the delay in seeking relief. (Para 2 , 4)
3. ratios surrounding representation and delay. (Para 5)
4. dismissal of the appeal due to lack of merit. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, CJ. (ORAL)--Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 3051/2022 (Exemption) & CM APPL. 3052/2022 (Exemption to file lengthy list of dates)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Applications stand disposed of.

LPA 48/2022

1. Being aggrieved and feeling dissatisfied with the judgment dated 07.12.2021, passed by the Learned Single Judge in writ petition being W.P. (C) 13910/2021, the Appellant (Original Petitioner) has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.

2. We have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant and have looked into the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. The case of the Appellant is that he had constructed a shop in Meena Bazar, opposite Jama Masjid, Delhi in the year 1971 and had paid damages to DDA upto the year 1975. Between the period from 1975 to 1976, a demolition drive was conducted, during which the shop of the A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top