SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Krishan Kumar Mehra – Appellant
Versus
Roop Lall Mehra – Respondent


Table of Content
1. property ownership and partition rights are established. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. auction procedures and bid amounts in partition disputes. (Para 10 , 11)
3. arguments regarding the objections raised by defendant no.1. (Para 14 , 15)
4. court's observations on maintainability and procedural compliance. (Para 16 , 22 , 24 , 36)
5. conclusion with orders for property possession and financial settlements. (Para 40 , 41 , 42)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. The present petition challenges the impugned judgment and order dated 23rd August, 2017, passed by the Ld. ADJ-04 (South East), Saket (hereinafter "Trial Court") in Civil Suit No. 208039/2016 titled Shir Krishna Kumar Mehra v. Shri Roop Lall Mehra by which the application filed by the Respondent No.2/Maj. Prem Kumar Mehta/Defendant No.2 (hereinafter "Defendant No.2") seeking leave to deposit 1/5th share of the sale proceeds of the Defendant No.1 was dismissed. The said application was duly supported by the Petitioner Sh. Krishna Kumar Mehra/Plaintiff/Petitioner (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and the Respondent No.3/Defendant No.3 (hereinafter "Defendant No.3") & Respondent No.4/Defendant No.4 (hereinafter "Defendant No.4"

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top