Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, N.SENTHILKUMAR
K.S.Gita – Appellant
Versus
Beena Kosaraju – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.
1. This OSA has been filed challenging an order passed on 25.04.2025 in A.No.5572 of 2024 in C.S.No.76 of 2009 filed by R1. The Suit has been filed seeking a judgment and decree against the respondents as follows:
(a) that the properties comprised in the estate of late K.Subbiah, morefully described in the schedules hereunder be divided by metes and bounds and 1/4th (one fourth) share be allotted to the Plaintiff;
(b) consequently, that the Defendants be directed to render true and proper accounts of the income earned through the properties, running businesses and properties purchased thereof from and out of the assets and businesses of late K.Subbiah and give 1/4th share thereof to the Plaintiff
(c) Permanent injunction restraining the 2nd Defendant, her agents and servants, any person and every person claiming though or under her in any manner disturbing the plaintiff's use, occupation and enjoyment of the property morefully described as item No.2 in the schedule hereunder.
(d) that an Advocate Commissioner be appointed to divide the immovable properties comprised in the estate of late K.Subbiah morefully described in the schedules hereunder, by metes a
The court upheld the auction of inherited property despite claims of procedural violations, emphasizing the discretion exercised in partition sales confirmed by prior decrees.
Unlike a stranger purchaser in a public auction, a co-sharer himself has a pre-existing right in suit schedule property. parties are given an option to go for auction to see that intrinsic value of s....
The court affirmed that under the Partition Act, when division by metes and bounds is impractical, public auction of shared property is permissible, with priority given to co-sharers only if they exp....
The court established that under the Partition Act, a court may direct the sale of property instead of division when it is determined that division is not feasible or would not be beneficial to the s....
In partition disputes, co-owners can forego monetary claims for shared occupancy, aligning with equitable principles tailored to family dynamics.
The Court held that the objections raised by Defendant No.1 were not tenable and allowed the revision petition in favor of the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 2, 3 & 4. The Court found that the objectio....
Point of law: “Conduct of indifference or Acquiescence and held that, it is settled law that an estoppel may arise as against persons who have not willfully made any misrepresentation, and whose cond....
The court ruled that under the Partition Act, a co-sharer can apply to purchase shares at valuation even after a sale order, emphasizing the court's duty to fix the upset price and uphold constitutio....
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to the Partition Act's provisions, particularly regarding the right of pre-emption and the process for property sales, allowing the second defendant to ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
