IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL, J.
Neeraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRM-M No. 78816 of 2018
Decided On : 17-07-2024
Quashing - FIR - IPC Sections 346, 363, 366-A; POCSO Act Section 6 - The court interpreted the provisions of IPC and POCSO Act, emphasizing the importance of the victim's consent and the implications of marriage on the charges, ultimately leading to the quashing of the FIR.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash an FIR alleging kidnapping of a minor, claiming he married the victim, who supported the quashing, stating the FIR was filed by her father against her wishes.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the victim had married the petitioner voluntarily and was living happily with him, thus quashing the FIR as it served no useful purpose to continue the proceedings.
Issues: Whether the FIR alleging kidnapping should be quashed given the victim's marriage to the accused and her assertion of leaving her father's home voluntarily.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that if a victim marries the accused and lives happily, the FIR alleging kidnapping may be quashed, especially when the victim supports the accused's plea.
Result: The FIR and all consequential proceedings are quashed.
JUDGMENT :
SUMEET GOEL, J.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as “Section 482”), by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 80 dated 29.01.2018 (impugned FIR) registered under Sections 346, 363, 366-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of POCSO Act at Police Station Mujesar, District Faridabad and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
2. It would be pertinent to refer herein to the factual matrix of the present lis:
“To,
Chowki Incharge,
Sanjay Colony,
Sector 23, Faridabad.
Sir,
It is submitted that I, Shiva son of Amar Singh, Caste Bawaria, am resident of H.No. 214, Jeewan Nagar Gochi near Sen Chowk, opposite Shiv Narain Durga Temple, Part-II, Faridabad. I have two sons and one daughter. My daughter Sapna is the eldest amongst my children, who is aged 15-16 years 1 of 8 and does household work. On 26.01.2018 at 7.20 Ñ.Ì., my daughter Sapna without informing anyone left the house alongwith 3 gold chains, one gold locket, four gold rings- 2 ladies & 2 gents, four gold necklace, two silver taagri, three pair anklet, two pair earrings and Rs.20,000/- cash. She is wearing orange colour suit, golden colour Salwar, ladies footwear and checked jacket. Her description is: round face, Wheatish complexion, slim body, height around 5', age 15-16 years, who has been kidnapped by some unknown person. My daughter and the gold and silver ornaments be recovered.
Sd/-”
The complainant/informant in the impugned FIR is Shiva, who has been impleaded as respondent No. 2 herein and the victim is his daughter namely Sapna.
(ii) The petitioner has pleaded that he got married with the victim namely Sapna on 19.09.2018 whereinafter they had been living as husband and wife. It has been further pleaded that after solemnization of marriage, the petitioner and the victim namely Sapna filed a petition for protection of their life and liberty before this Court vide CRM-M-45668-2018 which was disposed of vide order dated 15.10.2018; relevant whereof reads as under:
“In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. 2- Superintendent of Police, Palwal to look into the representation dated 19.09.2018 (Annexure P-4) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office.
However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted or intended against them under any law including the provisions of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.”
(iii) Indisputably, the victim-daughter of the complainant namely Sapna is living happily with the petitioner since the day of marriage. It is worthwhile to note that during the course of proceedings in the present petition, short reply by way of affidavit of Sapna (victim-respondent No. 3) has been filed, relevant whereof reads as under:
“6. That the deponent is legally wedded wife of petitioner and she has no objection, if the FIR in question is quashed by this Hon’ble court. The deponent is able to think about her bad and good and she is living with the petitioner. The respondent No. 2 has got lodged the FIR only to teach a lesson to the petitioner as well as the deponent as they have performed marriage against his wishes.
7. That the Respondent No. 2 is mother of father of deponent and the police is colluding with the Respondent No. 2 and has registered false FIR against the petitioner. The allegations as contained in the FIR are totally false, vague and baseless. Earlier also, false FIR was got registered. Infact, both the families are very poor and the questing of stealing 3 gold chains, one gold locket, four gold rings- 2 ladies & 2 g
The court established that a victim's marriage to the accused and her consent can negate allegations of kidnapping under IPC and POCSO Act.
The court established that marriage and cohabitation of the accused and victim negate the applicability of kidnapping charges under IPC.
Kidnapping - Saving inherit powers of High Court - Section 482 of Code, High Court has inherent power to quash criminal proceedings even in those cases which are not compoundable, where parties have ....
The court exercised its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C and considered the humanitarian approach to prevent the ruin of the lives of the petitioner, the prosecutrix, and their child.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'taking' and 'enticing' a minor under Section 361 IPC, and the court's exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C....
The court established that actions taken by a minor nearing the age of majority, when coupled with voluntary choice, negate allegations of kidnapping under IPC.
Quash a Proceeding - Power under section 482 Cr.P.C. entitles the High Court to quash a proceeding when it comes to the conclusion that allowing the proceedings to continue would be an abuse of the p....
The High Court may exercise its inherent powers to quash criminal proceedings when the parties have reconciled, entered into a marital relationship, and are living as a stable family, as continuing t....
The High Court may quash proceedings under inherent powers if a victim and offender marry post-allegation, promoting justice and familial stability despite non-compoundable offences.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.