SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Sukrita Bajaj – Appellant
Versus
Sundeep @ Sandeep Sehgal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)

EX.(OS) 1315/2021(u/O.XXI R-58 CPC)

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the judgment debtor seeking to place on record objections under Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (CPC), 1908, against the attachment/sale of basement, ground floor and third floor with terrace rights of property bearing No. S-87, Greater Kailash, Part-II, New Delhi.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the present application by the judgment debtor are: (i) The suit bearing no. CS (OS) 172/2017 filed by the petitioner herein was decreed in the sum of Rs. 2,81,25,000/-along with interest @ 10 % by this Court on 13th April, 2018: (ii) the present execution petition was filed by the decree holder on 22th May, 2018 for execution of the decree dated 13th April, 2018: (iii) notice was issued in the present petition and an order of attachment of properties bearing no. S-87, Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi and E-107, Ground Floor, Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi, was passed by this Court on 16th July, 2018. Further, the judgment debtor was directed to file an affidavit of assets in terms of Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the CPC; (iv) objections were filed b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top