Back
PRAKASH GUPTA
Manju Garg – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Chand Goyal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prakash Gupta, J. - Order 18/08/2021Civil Execution First Appeal No. 4/2021 has been filed by the objector-appellant (for short, 'the objector') under Section 96 CPC readwith Order 21 Rule 103 CPC against the order dated 20.7.2021 passed by the Executing Court in Civil Objection No. 98/2019 in Civil Execution Petition No. 22/2017 by which the objections filed by the objector under Order 21 Rule 58 have been dismissed. Similarly, Civil Execution First Appeal No. 5/2021 has been filed by the Objector under Section 96 CPC readwith Order 21 Rule 103 against the order dated 3.8.2021 passed by the Executing Court in Civil Objection No. 98/2019 in Execution Petition No. 22/2017, by which the objections filed by the Objector under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC have been dismissed.
2. Facts of the case are that the respondent-plaintiff-decree holder (for short, 'the decree holder') filed a suit against the respondent-defendant-judgment debtor (for short, 'the judgment debtor') for recovery of Rs. 81,24,786.23/-, which was decreed by the Court of Addl. District Judge, Tees Hajari Court, New Delhi vide its judgment dated 8.11.2016. The decree holder filed execution petition for satisfaction of
The court established that claims to property under execution must be substantiated by valid title and cannot be used to delay proceedings.
Objections against property attachment must be timely and consistent; delay and contradictory claims undermine their validity under CPC.
The main legal point established is that property conveyed to a Defendant's wife can be attached to satisfy a decree if the conveyance was done to evade execution, and legal heirs are liable to satis....
LAW POINTScope of investigation – Court cannot reject a claim without adjudication merely on the ground that question of title or possession is doubtful or complicated in nature.
A decree established in a suit under Order XXI does not automatically nullify an execution sale where necessary parties are not included, reaffirming the principles of execution law.
The burden of proving property as joint family lies with the party asserting it, and executing courts must allow opportunity for evidence in objections regarding property ownership during execution p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
