SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Airports Authority of India – Appellant
Versus
Air Traffic Safety Electronics Personnel Association (India) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. grounds for the appeal (Para 1)
2. arguments for expediting hearing (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's observations on appeal timing (Para 4 , 6)
4. conclusion and order for hearing (Para 5 , 7)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)

Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Being aggrieved and feeling dissatisfied by the interim order dated 25th August, 2020 passed by the Learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 2011/2020, the original Respondent No.1 has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.

2. We have heard learned counsels for the parties and looked into the facts and circumstances of the case. It is submitted by learned counsel for Respondent No.1 that the pleadings are complete in the writ petition before the Learned Single Judge and the petition is now listed on 15.02.2022. He further submits that Respondent No.2 has already preferred an application before the Learned Single Judge for modification of the interim order dated 25.08.2020, which is impugned in the present appeal. Since the petition is ripe for hearing, it is urged that no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending.

3. Learned counsel for the Appellant agrees that the ple

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top