SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Asha Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Arb.P. 907 of 2021
Decided On : 09-02-2022




Disputes arising under an agreement concerning construction are arbitrable, and a court may appoint an arbitrator as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11(6) - Petition for appointment of Arbitrator - Agreement to construct additional classrooms - Disputes regarding delay attributed to respondent for non-provision of drawings and delayed decisions - Respondent denied claims made by petitioner but acknowledged arbitrability of disputes. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Appointing Arbitrator - Court appointed Sugan Lal Meena as sole Arbitrator under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre's rules for dispute resolution. (Paras 6-8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner entered into an Agreement for construction work that was delayed beyond the completion date due to respondent's inactions. Several communications were made regarding the disputes, leading to the current petition.

Findings of Court:
The Court recognized the disputes as arbitrable and appointed an Arbitrator for resolution.

Issues: Whether disputes related to the Agreement are arbitrable and the need for Arbitrator appointment.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court noted that the arbitration is in accordance with the Agreement's Clause 25, endorsing the resolution of disputes through arbitration as stipulated in the Agreement.

Result: The petition is allowed; an Arbitrator is appointed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner filed for arbitration due to construction delays. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. parties agree disputes are arbitrable. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court appoints arbitrator and sets conditions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. petition disposed; arbitration to proceed. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes with respondent.

2. Petitioner/company claims to have entered into an Agreement with the respondent for construction of additional class rooms in SKV No.2, Sagarpur SPS School Building and other related works. According to the Agreement, the work was to commence on 19.02.2016 and completed on 03.07.2016. However, the work could be completed on 14.12.2017.

3. According to petitioner, the delay in execution of work is attributable to the respondent as drawings were not provided in time, there were delays in making decisions at the end of respondent and also there was delay in releasing the payments. Thereby, several disputes arose between the parties, for resolution of which petitioner claims to have written letters dated 24.07.2020 and 19.08.2020 to the respondent, in response to which vide letter dated 22.08.2020, respondent denied all the claims. Further again, petitioner claims to have written various letters to the Chief Engineer of respondent, who vide letter dated 05.08.2021 rejected the request of petitioner for appointment of Arbitrator. Hence, the present petition has been filed.

4. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that the disputes between the parties have to be resolved by arbitration in terms of Clause 25 of the Agreement and therefore, this Court may appoint an arbitrator for adjudication of disputes with respondent.

5. Learned counsel for respondent has entered appearance on advance notice and he submits that though the claims raised in the present petition are disputed, however, since disputes are arbitrable, this Court may appoint an independent arbitrator.

6. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and Sugan Lal Meena (EX. ADG PWD) (Mobile: 987421661) is appointed the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

7. The arbitration shall be conducted under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC). The fee of the Arbitrator shall be in accordance with the Schedule of Fees prescribed under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators Fees) Rules, 2018.

8. The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.

9. The present petition and pending application, if any, are accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top