SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Vijay Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

Rajiv Shakdher, J.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Preface:

    Background:-

    Submissions on behalf of the petitioners:-

    Submissions on behalf of FCI

    Analysis and reasons

    Conclusion

Preface:

1. Shorn of unnecessary details, the grievance which has impelled the petitioners to approach this Court is briefly this:

1.1. The petitioners, who are regular employees of respondent no.2 i.e., the Food Corporation of India [hereafter referred to as "FCI"] apprehend being transferred en bloc from FCI Food Storage Depots [in short "FSDs"] located at Shakti Nagar and Mayapuri to depots located at Okhla and other locations.

1.2. It is the petitioners' case that both depots i.e., FCI FSDs located at Shakti Nagar and Mayapuri, where they are presently located, have notifications issued qua them, under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation &Abolition) Act, 1970 [in short "CLRA Act"]. Thus, according to the petitioners, once the notification under Section 10 of the CLRA Act was issued, the FCI could not have deployed contract labour in the aforementioned depots [i.e., FSD Shakti Nagar and FSD Mayapuri], and therefore, in purs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top