SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(KER) 1071

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J.
Rajan C. and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India, Through Ministry Of Labour And Employment, Represented By Its Secretary and Ors. – Respondents 
W.P.(C) Nos. 16329 of 2021, 5891 and 6283 of 2022, 15896 and 16618 of 2023
Decided On : 07-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : BY ADVS. RAJESH MOHAN SINHA N.SATHEESH K.JANARDHANA SHENOY PRIYA CAROL PRATEEK MOHAN SINHA
For the Respondent: BY ADVS. SRI.M.A.VINOD, CGC SRI.JOSE KURIAKOSE (Vilangattil) SMT.SEEMANDINI (SR.) SRI.A.K.HARIDAS SRI.JAJU BABU

The exemption under the Contract Labour Act is valid, allowing the Food Corporation to engage contract labour and transfer DPS workers, affirming the authority of the employer in service matters.

Headnote:(A) Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Section 31 - Exemption notification dated 06.07.2016 challenged - The petitioners, DPS workers, argue that the exemption is illegal as it violates the Act prohibiting contract labour in notified depots - The Food Corporation of India claims exemption is valid and necessary for rationalization - The court finds no illegality in the exemption or the e-tender process, affirming the authority of FCI to transfer workers and implement guidelines for optimal workforce utilization. (Paras 1, 10, 30, 34)

(B) Legal principles - The court emphasizes that transfer is an incident of service and the authority to transfer lies with the employer, supported by previous judgments. (Paras 31, 32)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners are DPS workers at a Food Storage Depot, claiming that the depot is a notified location where contract labour is prohibited. They challenge the exemption notification and the subsequent e-tender notices for engaging contract labour.

Findings of Court:
The court finds the exemption notification valid and the e-tender process justified, dismissing the writ petitions.

Issues: The main issues include the legality of the exemption notification, the validity of e-tender notices, the transfer of DPS workers, and the sustainability of FCI guidelines.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the exemption notification is valid, the FCI has the authority to engage contract labour, and transfers of workers are permissible under service jurisprudence.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(N. NAGARESH, J.)

Dated this the 7th day of January, 2025 The issueS raised in all these writ petitions are whether the exemption under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 granted by the Government of India to the Food Corporation of India as per Notification dated 06.07.2016 is valid, whether the action of the Food Corporation of India in finalising e-tenders for engaging contract labours at their godowns is justified and whether the transfer of DPS workers effected by the Food Corporation of India is sustainable or not. For convenience, the parties to the writ petitions and exhibits marked are referred to as they appear in W.P.(C) No.16618 of 2023.

2. The petitioners are labourers under Direct Payment System (DPS), working under the Food Corporation of India, in their Food Storage Depot ((FSD), at Kazhakoottam, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioners state that the FSD Kazhakoottam is a notified Depot under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

3. The petitioners state that notified depots are those depots where employment of contract labour is prohibited. By the judgment in PIL No.84 of 2014 dated 20.11.2015, the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench directed the Government of India to decide the representation made by the Food Corporation of India for grant of exemption under the provisions of Section 31 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. The Government of India was also directed to decide the issue regarding the notification of the depots of the Food Corporation of India.

4. The Central Advisory Contract Labour Board (CACLB) dismissed the application of the Food Corporation of India for grant of exemption. The Food Corporation of India did not challenge the decision of the CACLB. However, the 1st respondent-Union of India arbitrarily passed exemption notification dated 06.07.2016 under Section 31 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

5. On the basis of the exemption notification dated 06.07.2016 issued by the Union of India, the Food Corporation of India issued letter dated 12.07.2016, laying down guidelines to be followed by its General Managers. The guidelines provided that subsequent to pooling of Labours, handling contractors be deployed in vacant depots following due process.

6. The labour unions challenged the guidelines dated 12.07.2016 filing writ petition in the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi passed Ext.P1 order dated 02.05.2017, directing to maintain status quo with regard to conditions of service in respect of the workmen during the pendency of the petition. By Ext.P2 order, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi stayed the order to transfer the workers of FCI issued pursuant to the notification dated 06.07.2016. Ext.P2 order was made absolute as per Ext.P3 order dated 04.02.2019.

7. The petitioners state that when the Food Corporation of India published its Tender Notice to employ contract labour in FSD, Shakti Nagar, a Division Bench of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court quashed the Tender Notice as per Ext.P5 judgment in W.P.(C) Nos.5080 and 6060 of 2021. The Hon'ble Apex Court stayed the operation of Ext.P5 judgment as per Ext.P6 order dated 13.04.2022 in S.L.P.(C) No.5997 of2022.

8. The petitioners state that the 3rd respondent-General Manager, FCI Regional Office, Thiruvananthapuram issued Ext.P7 Tender Notice dated 28.04.2023, inviting tenders from individuals for appointment as Handling and Transportation Contractors for food grains at FSD, Kazhakoottam, for a period of two years. Ext.P7 Tender Notice was followed by Ext.P8 e-tender notice dated 20.05.2023.

9. The petitioners state that in identical circumstances, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, in W.P.(C) No.5080 of 2021, stayed the Tender Notice published by FCI to employ contract labour in FSD. The notifications dated 06.07.2016, 26.06.2018, 25.06.2020 and 19.10.2022 of the Union of India are absolutely arbitrary and illegal and are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top