SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2267

PRASHANT KUMAR, MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
Ghanshyam Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vijay Kumar
For the Respondent: A.S.G.I.,Santosh Kumar Mishra

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Sri. Gopal Chandra Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri. Santosh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent-Food Corporation of India.

2. By means of instant writ petition the petitioners sought for the following reliefs:-

    "i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned exemption notification dated 06.07.2016, under section 31 of CL( R & A) Act, 1970 issued by FCI. (Subject matter of writ petitions (civil) no.7627 of 2016 & 7241/16 filed before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi).

    ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned guidelines dated 12.07.2016 issued by FCI- Respondent no.2 to its general managers for implementation of the aforesaid exemption notification vide letter no.IR-L/31 (10)/2004/vol. x dated 12.07.2016, issued by FCI;

    iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of quashing the letter dated 30.10.2021 (Impugned Order) bearing no.IR-L/14(7)/2021 issued by Assistant General Manager (IR-L) respondent no.2.

    iv) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the tender dated 18.02.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top