SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine – Appellant
Versus
Salma Khatoon (Dr.) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. grievance regarding retiral benefits. (Para 2 , 3)
2. delay in payment of retiral benefits. (Para 4)
3. tribunal's order on retiral dues. (Para 5)
4. petitioner's argument on releasing dues. (Para 6)
5. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 7670/2022

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 2681/2022 & CM APPL. 7669/2022[Application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking interim relief]

2. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 20.09.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short, "the Tribunal"] in

O.A. No.2058/2021.

2.1. The record shows that respondent no.1 had approached the Tribunal with the grievance that she was not being paid her retiral benefits.

3. It is not disputed before us by the counsel for the parties that respondent no. 1, in another matter i.e., W.P.(C.) 9554/2018, is agitating that her age of superannuation ought to be 65 years and not 60 years.

3.1. Briefly, respondent no.1 in the aforesaid writ petition is claiming parity with the age of superannuation provided for General Duty M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top