SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Rahul Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Rattan India Enterprises Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition under arbitration and conciliation act (Para 1)
2. detail of agreements and appointments (Para 2 , 3)
3. breach of contractual and fiduciary duties (Para 4 , 5)
4. arbitration notice and party responses (Para 6 , 7)
5. court observations on respondent's presence (Para 8 , 9)
6. appointment of sole arbitrator (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
7. disposal of the petition (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes inter-se the parties.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is promoter of respondent No.2 & respondent No.1 is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. Shareholders' Agreement dated 28.04.2021 was entered into between petitioner and respondents & Share Subscription Agreement dated 28.04.2021 was entered into between petitioner and respondent No.1 to 6.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that upon execution of aforesaid Agreements, in terms of Clause 3.7 of Shareholders' Agreement dated 28.04.2021, the nominee of respondent No.1 was appointed as the Chief Fina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top