Sanjay Singh vs N.C.T. of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
YASHWANT VARMA
Sanjay Singh – Appellant
Versus
N.C.T. of Delhi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. details of petitioners' contractual engagement. (Para 1)
2. claims for regularization of employment. (Para 2 , 3)
3. maintainability of the writ petition. (Para 4 , 5)
4. failure to establish statutory appointment. (Para 6 , 7)
5. claim for equal pay based on legislative obligations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
6. irregular vs. illegal appointments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. court's analysis of precedents and relevancy. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
8. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 18)

JUDGMENT

Yashwant Varma, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioners here were engaged on contractual basis in the third respondent Institution. They were engaged in the capacity of Bus Drivers (petitioner Nos. 1 to 3), Bus Conductors (petitioner No. 4) and Gardeners (petitioner No. 5). They are stated to have been appointed on a consolidated pay as per the particulars set forth in paragraph 3 of the writ petition. Undisputedly no appointment letters are stated to have been issued in their favour. The writ petition itself has been preferred seeking the following reliefs: -

"a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction for the respondent to release the salaries/arrears of the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTYASHWANT VARMASanjay Singh – AppellantVersusN.C.T. of Delhi – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
YASHWANT VARMA
Sanjay Singh – Appellant
Versus
N.C.T. of Delhi – Respondent