SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Nazir Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
I.A. No. 11654 of 2019
This interlocutory application being I.A. No. 11654 of 2019 has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 55 days in preferring the instant appeal.
2. Considering the sufficient cause as has been referred in the interlocutory application and having no objection on the part of the Respondents, the delay of 55 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.
3. I.A. No. 11654 of 2019 stands allowed.
L.P.A. No. 858 of 2019
4. Heard the parties.
5. The appeal is under clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the impugned judgement dated 16.08.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court by which the prayer for regularisation of the services of the writ petitioners and in consequence upon to release the regular pay-scale has been denied by dismissing the writ petition.
6. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition are required to be narrated herein under:
7. The petitioners have preferred the writ petitions for a direction in the nature of mandamus especially to the Jharkhand Education Project Council (Hereinafter to be referred as the “JEPC”) for regularization in service w.e
Mahesh Chandra Verma Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Narendra Kumar Tiwari and Ors. Vs. States of Jharkhand and Ors.
Secretary, State of Karnatak and Ors. Vs. Uma Devi and Ors.
State of Jammu and Kashmir Vs. District Bar Association, Bandipora
the State of Bihar Vs. Bihar Secondary Teachers Struggle Committee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.