HFCL Advance Systems Private Limited vs Centre for Development of Advance Computing (C-DAC)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
HFCL Advance Systems Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Centre for Development of Advance Computing (C-DAC) – Respondent

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and parties involved (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. background of the joint venture establishment (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. petitioner's bid submission details (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. respondent's grounds for disqualification (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. respondent's arguments against petitioner's claim (Para 16 , 24 , 25)
6. petitioner's arguments in defense (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
7. court's analysis of joint venture requirements (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
8. court's conclusion on disqualification (Para 33 , 34)
9. final dismissal of the petition (Para 35)

JUDGMENT

Jasmeet Singh, J. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of communication dated 16.11.2021 issued by respondent No. 1, whereby the petitioner has been communicated its disqualification in respect of RFP tender No. CDACP/Safety City/MSI/2020/313, for selection of Master System Integrator (MSI) for Implementation, Operation and Maintenance of Surveillance System under Safe City Project of Delhi Police.

2. The case of the petitioner in a nutshell is that the petitioner- HFCL Advance Systems Private Limited (hereinafter called "HASPL") is a Joint Venture (JV), with M/s HFCL Limited hol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTVIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGHHFCL Advance Systems Private Limited – AppellantVersusCentre for Development of Advance Computing (C-DAC) – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
HFCL Advance Systems Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Centre for Development of Advance Computing (C-DAC) – Respondent