SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Kores (India) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Doms Industries Private Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to trademark registrations (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments on additional issues in trademark litigation (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
3. overview of trademarks and evidence presented (Para 7 , 9)
4. court's role in trademark validity challenges (Para 10 , 11)
5. decisions on additional issues and trial progression (Para 12 , 14)
6. procedure for challenging trademark registrations (Para 13)
7. conclusion and order of the court (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 4th January, 2022, passed in CS (COMM) 312/19 titled Doms Industries Private Limited v. Kores India Limited, by which the application of the Petitioner/Defendant (hereinafter "Defendant") under Order XIV Rule 5 CPC for framing of additional issues has been rejected by the Commercial Court.

3. The submission of Mr. Abhishek Mishra, ld. Counsel appearing for the Defendant, is that the suit in this case was filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter "Plaintiff") for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks, unfair trade practice, damages, etc. He submits that initially,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top