SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Ashok Panwar – Appellant
Versus
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners seek electricity connection amid title dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. legal representation acknowledges dispute over connection. (Para 5 , 6)
3. possession is critical for granting connection. (Para 7)
4. connection granted without prejudice to ongoing suit. (Para 8 , 9)
5. petition disposed affirming respondent's obligation. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--Petitioners seek a direction to the respondent to grant a fresh electricity connection in the name of either of the petitioners at shop in property No.125, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi, more particularly, shown and marked as shop No. B in site plan annexed to the petition (Annexure P-5).

2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there is an ongoing dispute with the family members of the petitioners and a Suit for partition has been filed by petitioner No.1. He submits that even though there is an interim order in favour of the petitioner No.1 dated 09.11.2021 in CS (OS) 580/2021, protecting the possession of the petitioner No.1, electricity supply has been disconnected by the defendants to the suit.

3. He submits that without prejudice to the said suit, an application was made by P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top