SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1947

AMARJOT BHATTI
Shushma Rani – Appellant
Versus
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Amarjot Bhatti, J.

1. The petitioner – Shushma Rani has filed revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 13.09.2023, Annexure P-1 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fatehabad and another order dated 21.08.2023, Annexure P-2 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ratia vide which the request of the petitioner/plaintiff for ad interim injunction for the electricity connection in her name being occupant of the premises was declined.

2. The brief facts of the case are Shushma Rani filed suit for declaration to the effect that she is entitled for domestic supply electricity connection in her name under her occupation on the ground floor part of matrimonial home/shared household i.e. House No. 201, Ward No. 10, Ratia, as per Electricity Act, 2003 with the consequential relief of mandatory injunction directing the defendants to provide the fresh electricity connection in her name. In the said plaint, the petitioner/plaintiff had filed application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of C.P.C. seeking ad interim injunction. The learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff argued that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top