SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Sanjay Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


ORDER

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. The present revision petition under Section 401 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the revisionist with the following prayers:

    "a) Call for the record of the Ld. Courts below and set aside/quash/annul the judgment dated 26.03.2021 passed by Sh. Sandeep Yadav, Ld. ASJ-02, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Crl. Appeal bearing Cr. No. 525/2019 which was filed against impugned judgment dated 29.07.2019 passed by Sh. Anubhav Jain, Ld. MM, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in C.C. No. 2618/2017 U/s 138 NI Act whereby the Ld. MM was pleased to hold the petitioner guilty and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 3 months and to pay fine of Rs.7,00,000/- which completely shall be paid as compensation to the complainant, by which the Ld. ASJ-02, dismissed the appeal of the petitioner and modified the sentence and directed to pay fine of Rs.7,00,000/- to the complainant/respondent No. 2 and in default of payment of fine within 4 weeks, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months.

    b) Pass any other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top