Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Sanjay Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition under section 401 cr.p.c. regarding conviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's reasoning on cheque dishonor and legal presumption. (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments regarding legal liability and evidence presented. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's observations on the revisionist's claims and evidence. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. dismissal of revision petition and upholding prior judgment. (Para 11) |
ORDER
Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. The present revision petition under Section 401 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the revisionist with the following prayers:
"a) Call for the record of the Ld. Courts below and set aside/quash/annul the judgment dated 26.03.2021 passed by Sh. Sandeep Yadav, Ld. ASJ-02, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Crl. Appeal bearing Cr. No. 525/2019 which was filed against impugned judgment dated 29.07.2019 passed by Sh. Anubhav Jain, Ld. MM, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in C.C. No. 2618/2017 U/s 138 NI Act whereby the Ld. MM was pleased to hold the petitioner guilty and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 3 months and to pay fine of Rs.7,00,000/- which completely shall be paid as compensation to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
