SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
DGCRPF – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's promotion grievances and history. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. respondent's agreement to consider representation. (Para 7)
3. court acknowledges communication history. (Para 8)
4. court's directive for fresh representation. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. By this petition, petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent to promote the petitioner to the higher grade with all consequential benefits. In addition, petitioner is also praying for costs of filing the writ petition.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that petitioner had joined the services of Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) on 24.07. 1985 on the post of ASI/GD and is presently posted in Jammu and Kashmir as ASI. Petitioner is aggrieved that though he is due for promotion since the year 2012, however, he has not been promoted.

5. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that petitioner had made various communications to the respondent i.e. 13.03.2012; 16.05.2012 and 06.08.2012 regarding his grievances on the promotion aspect. A represe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top