SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Sudhir Kumar Jain, JJ.
Sachin Kumar, (EX CPL 903353-S) - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 4583 of 2022 & CM Appl. 13746 of 2022
Decided On : 22-03-2022




Officers with a minimum of 10 years of service are entitled to pro-rata pension, contingent on submission of specific documents confirming eligibility.

Headnote:(A) Notification No. 8(3)/86/A/D (Pension/Services) dated 19.02.1987 - Circular No.A/49738/AG/PS4(c)/689/A/D(Pens/Sers) dated 21.04.1988 - Pro-rata pension entitlement for officers with at least 10 years of qualifying service established. (Paras 2, 5)

(B) Requirements for pension approval - Submission of joining report from current organization and declaration of not leveraging past service required for pension processing. (Paras 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, having served in the Indian Air Force for over 10 years, sought pro-rata pension following his discharge on 17.06.2014, in accordance with previous judgments by the court.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the petitioner to submit necessary documentation for the release of his pro-rata pension, contingent upon verification of his eligibility.

Issues: The core issue was the petitioner’s eligibility for pro-rata pension based on his service duration and the required documentation for approval.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of the required documents for pension eligibility and directed the respondents to process the application upon receipt.

Result: The petition was disposed of with directives for documentation submission.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks pro-rata pension based on prior service. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs consideration of pension claim upon document receipt. (Para 3 , 5)
3. requirement for necessary documents for pension claim. (Para 4)
4. petition disposed of with directions. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT(Oral)

1. The present petition has been preferred seeking a direction to the respondents to grant pro-rata pension to the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that vide Notification No. 8(3)/86/A/D (Pension/Services) dated 19.02.1987 and further, by circular No.A/49738/AG/PS4(c)/689/A/D(Pens/Sers) dated 21.04.1988 issued by the Government of India/Ministry of Defence, officers with not less than 10 years of qualifying service are entitled to receive pro-rata pension worked out under the method specified. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was enrolled in Indian Air Force on 12.01.2004 and he stood discharged from services of IAF on 17.06.2014 after serving 10 years, 05 months and 05 days of regular service. Therefore, it is prayed that respondents be directed to issue pro-rata pension to petitioner.

3. Notice issued.

4. Mr. Syeed Abdul Haseeb, Advocate, has entered appearance on advance notice and submits that petitioner is required to furnish a copy of his joining report/letter from his current organization i.e. Central Armed Police Force (CAPF) and a certificate/affidavit/declaration that petitioner has not taken benefit of his past service.

5. In view of aforesaid, we hereby dispose of the present petition with direction to the petitioner to provide a copy of his joining letter/report in his current organization i.e. CAPF as well as a declaration/certificate issued by CAPF specifically stating that petitioner has not taken the benefit of his past service. Upon receipt of aforesaid documents, respondents are directed to consider the case of petitioner and release pro-rata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

6. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top