SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Sudhir Kumar Jain, JJ.
Bimal Kumar Bimlesh - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 3170 of 2022
Decided On : 04-04-2022




Entitlement to pro-rata pension for government employees is upheld as per established rules and prior judgments, requiring appropriate action by the authorities.

Headnote:(A) Government of India/Ministry of Defence Notification No. 8(3)/86/A/D (Pension/Services) dated 19.02.1987; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Pro-rata pension - Petitioner, having served over 10 years, is entitled to pro-rata pension under relevant notifications and judgments. (Paras 1, 2, 4)

(B) Legal entitlement - Central Government employees are entitled to pro-rata pensions as outlined by relevant rules and notifications. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, having served 11 years and 200 days in the Indian Air Force, sought pro-rata pension which was denied. A previous representation was made but rejected before approaching the court.

Findings of Court:
The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's entitlement for pro-rata pension and release it with appropriate interest as per prior judgments.

Issues: Main issues included the petitioner’s eligibility for pro-rata pension based on service duration and previous court judgments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that entitlement to pro-rata pension for government employees is supported by existing rules and prior landmark judgments, obligating the respondents to act accordingly.

Result: The petition was disposed of with directions for consideration of pension release.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks quashing of an order and pension benefits. (Para 1)
2. eligibility for pro-rata pension based on service duration. (Para 2)
3. central government employees entitled to pro-rata pension. (Para 4)
4. court directed to consider pro-rata pension eligibility. (Para 5)
5. petition disposed with directions to respondents. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT(Oral)

1. The present petition has been preferred seeking quashing and setting aside of impugned order dated 22.06.2021; direction to respondents to grant pro-rata pension to the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that vide Notification No. 8(3)/86/A/D (Pension/Services) dated 19.02.1987 issued by the Government of India/Ministry of Defence, officers with not less than 10 years of qualifying service are entitled to receive pro-rata pension worked out under the method specified. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was enrolled in Indian Air Force (IAF) as an Airman on 21.05.1996 and he stood discharged from services of IAF on 10.12.2007 after serving 11 years, 200 days of regular service. He had preferred a representation dated 25.05.2021 to the respondents to grant him pro-rata pension, which was rejected by the respondents on 22.06.2021. Therefore, it is prayed that respondents be directed to issue pro-rata pension to petitioner.

3. Notice issued.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by virtue of Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.05.2005 and in terms with Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension. Further submits that in view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019, which is upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioners for their past services in Air Force.

5. Upon hearing, we dispose of the present petition with direction to respondents to consider the case of petitioners and release pro-rata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

6. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top