SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Bimal Kumar Bimlesh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition seeks quashing of an order and pension benefits. (Para 1)
2. eligibility for pro-rata pension based on service duration. (Para 2)
3. central government employees entitled to pro-rata pension. (Para 4)
4. court directed to consider pro-rata pension eligibility. (Para 5)
5. petition disposed with directions to respondents. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT(Oral)

1. The present petition has been preferred seeking quashing and setting aside of impugned order dated 22.06.2021; direction to respondents to grant pro-rata pension to the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that vide Notification No. 8(3)/86/A/D (Pension/Services) dated 19.02.1987 issued by the Government of India/Ministry of Defence, officers with not less than 10 years of qualifying service are entitled to receive pro-rata pension worked out under the method specified. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was enrolled in Indian Air Force (IAF) as an Airman on 21.05.1996 and he s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top