SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Madasu Sampath Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2782 of 2019
Decided On : 02-11-2022




Legal obligation to grant pro-rata pension exists under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules for eligible employees, requiring authorities to act accordingly.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW

(B) dated 26.05.2005 - Pro-rata pension - Petitioner discharged from IAF after 11 years of service sought pro-rata pension for services rendered - Court directed consideration of eligibility for pension and release with appropriate interest based on earlier judgments. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Writ of Mandamus - Scope and nature - Court can issue directions compelling authorities to perform their duties if there is a legal obligation to do so. (Paras 1-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner served in the Indian Air Force from 14.11.1995 until discharged on 27.03.2007. He applied for a post in Union Bank of India but could not join on the initial date due to service exigencies. Petition filed seeking pro-rata pension as per established rules due to his past service.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's eligibility for pro-rata pension and to release it if found deserving, along with appropriate interest as per earlier judgments.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to receive pro-rata pension for his service rendered in the IAF and under what conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that when a legal obligation exists, authorities must act to grant benefits such as pensions, with directions to complete the necessary formalities promptly.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions to consider and release pro-rata pension if eligible.

Table of Content
1. entitlement to pro-rata pension based on service. (Para 1 , 2)
2. legal basis for pension entitlement under rules. (Para 3)
3. court's directive for consideration of entitlement. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. final disposal of petition with directions. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the date of his discharge from IAF.

2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled as airmen in the Indian Air Force on 14.11.1995 and undergone required training successfully. Petitioner applied and cleared all the examinations in the selection process for the post of Probationary Officer under the Union Bank of India through proper channel with due permission from respondents. The petitioner was offered to join the above-said post in Union Bank of India in terms of the appointment letter dated 03.03.2007, through which he was directed to join the services of the bank by 20.03.2007. However, due to some service exigencies, he could not join on the said date and he submitted an application dated 12.03.2007 seeking extension of joining time and the same was acceded to by the said bank and his date of joining was extended upto 21.04.2007. The petitioner stood discharged from the services of IAF on 27.03.2007 after rendering regular service of 11 years, 04 months and 11 days.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.05.2005 and in terms with Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension and that in view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 rendered in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016, titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors., which has been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for their past services in Air Force.

4. Notice issued.

5. Mr.Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, learned Central Government Standing Counsel has entered appearance on advance notice and submits that the case of petitioner shall be considered and his pro-rata pension shall be released, if found eligible.

6. Upon hearing, we dispose of the present petition with direction to respondents to consider the case of petitioner and release pro-rata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

7. We hereby make it clear that respondents shall send a communication to the petitioner for completion of formalities and the same shall be submitted by the petitioner within one week thereafter. On receipt of the documents, final decision shall be taken by the respondents within four weeks thereafter.

8. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top