SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Madasu Sampath Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. entitlement to pro-rata pension based on service. (Para 1 , 2)
2. legal basis for pension entitlement under rules. (Para 3)
3. court's directive for consideration of entitlement. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. final disposal of petition with directions. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the date of his discharge from IAF.

2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled as airmen in the Indian Air Force on 14.11.1995 and undergone required training successfully. Petitioner applied and cleared all the examinations in the selection process for the post of Probationary Officer under the Union Bank of India through proper channel with due permission from respondents. The petitioner was offered to join the above-said post in Union Bank of India in terms of the appointment letter dated 03.03.2007, through which he was directed to join the services of the bank by 20.03.2007. However, due to some service exigencies, he could not join on the said date and he submitted an application dated 12.03.2007 seeking extension of joining time a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top