SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Rapid Constructions - Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P(C) 4730 of 2022 & CM Appl. 14157 of 2022
Decided On : 25-03-2022




The lack of a show cause notice before debarment violates principles of natural justice, necessitating revocation of the order.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Law - The principles of natural justice require that a show cause notice be issued prior to an adverse action against an individual. (Paras 2, 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged an order debarring them from tender participation without prior notice or service of the order itself.

Findings of Court:
The court set aside the debarment order and the circular, allowing for due process to follow.

Issues: The main question addressed was whether the failure to issue a show cause notice prior to debarring the petitioner was lawful.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the lack of a show cause notice infringes on the principles of natural justice, warranting the revocation of the order. (Para 6)

Result: The order and circular were set aside, subject to the respondent's right to issue a show cause notice.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)--Petitioner impugns circular dated 17.02.2022 informing the petitioner that the competent authority by order dated 03.02.2022 has decided to debar the petitioner for a period of two years from participation in any bid/tender of the respondent South Delhi Municipal Corporation.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no show cause notice was issued to the petitioner prior to issuance of the alleged order dated 03.02.2022 or the impugned circular dated 17.02.2022. He further submits that copy of the order dated 03.02.2022 has not even served on the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent disputes the same.

4. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the competent authority was constrained to pass the order in view of the conduct of the petitioner.

5. He without prejudice submits that in view of the technical objection taken by the petitioner that no show cause notice was issued prior to passing of the debarment order, the competent authority has decided to revoke the debarment order reserving the right of the Corporation to issue a show cause notice to the petitioner and then to pass a fresh order in accordance with law.

6. In view of the above, the order dated 03.02.2022 and the circular dated 17.02.2022 is set aside. This would be without prejudice to the right of the respondent to issue a show cause notice to the petitioner for any alleged infraction. Respondent shall dispose of the show cause notice in accordance with law. All rights and contentions of parties are reserved.

7. It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor commented upon the merits of the contention of either party.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top