Praveen Kumar vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Praveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation – Respondent

Table of Content
1. evaluation of the petitioner's qualifications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of the petitioner's educational background and applications. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments presented by petitioner and dmrc. (Para 10 , 11)
4. court's reasoning on qualifications and equivalencies. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface

Background

Submissions on behalf of the petitioner

Submissions on behalf of the contesting respondent i.e., DMRC

Analysis and reasons

Conclusion

Preface:

1. This is a writ petition directed against the order dated 17.02.2020, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short 'Tribunal'] in O.A. No.3747/2016. Uncharacteristically, although respondent no.1's action was assailed by two applicants in the Tribunal, the writ action has been preferred by only one of them.

2. The petitioner before us is aggrieved as he has not been appointed to the post of Maintainer-Electronic Mechanic; bearing post-code NE10(C) [hereafter referred to as 'subject post'].

2.1. Respondent no. 1, in defence of its action, ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTRAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGHPraveen Kumar – AppellantVersusDelhi Metro Rail Corporation – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Praveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation – Respondent