SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 86

RATNAKER BHENGRA
Kalendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mahesh Tewari.
For the Respondent: Om Prakash Tiwari.

JUDGMENT :

RATNAKER BHENGRA, J.

1. This writ petition was ordered to be heard along with WP (S) No. 1032 of 2014, as per order of this court dated 29.09.2015.

2. In the present writ petition petitioner has prayed for writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the letter No. 179, dated 16.02.2014 (Annexure-8) issued by respondent no. 2 wherein, it has been intimated to the petitioner that petitioner has passed from Technical Examination Board, Gujarat, which is not recognized from SCVT/NCVT and hence petitioner's appointment to the post of Fitter (Anudeshak) cannot be considered. Further prayer has been made for direction commanding upon the respondent no. 2 to appoint the petitioner as a Fitter (Anudeshak) from the date on which persons, ranked below to the petitioner in the merit list were appointed as a Fitter (Anudeshak).

3. The factual background of the case is that respondents-authorities published an Advertisement No. 50 dated 08.09.2009 for appointment in different posts under the respondent no. 2. At serial no. 2 of the said advertisement, 55 posts were advertised for the post of Fitter (Anudeshak) or Fitter instructor. Petitioner had applied for the post of Fitter (Anude

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top